I have been really enjoying your comments. Please keep them coming!
To my Food Allergy Trauma post, Pam and Jennifer B. commented that they feel the need to be more protective than lax, because of their children’s young ages and/or the severity of their children’s allergies. That makes perfect sense, on both counts. Where I struggle, now that my daughter is in elementary school, is how to give her the freedom she needs (but luckily does not yet crave). I am afraid that being overprotective may not serve her long term interests — it can be overly restrictive and deny her of opportunities she would enjoy. But since I am more worried about the devastating consequences of being too lax, I often err on the side of being overly protective.
Some examples of where I waver from lax to overprotective:
Do I let her play outside by herself with other kids her age? Depends who they are, depends how far out of my sight they go, depends how long they are gone. More on that later.
Do I let her leave the house without an epi-pen? Absolutely not is the right answer. But I’ve found myself (especially in my sleep deprived state, of late) walking with her around the neighborhood –or even to a neighborhood park– without one. Would I be furious if another caregiver did that? Absolutely. A double standard? You bet.
Do I let her eat manufactured food without a disclaimer label (think Rold Gold pretzels or Teddy Grahams) or one whose disclaimer label isn’t what I’d like it to be. (Most snack food is manufactured in shared facilities with dairy, if not tree nuts or peanuts, but I still allow her to eat original Pringles, Pretzel Thins, and Snap Pea Crisps.)
Amy’s comment on allowing her child to eat store-bought vanilla ice cream in her presence but not in the presence of others struck a chord with me. I have been known to apply the same double standard on foods without a disclaimer label. I somehow feel that if she eats it in my presence, I am more prepared/better equipped to deal with a reaction than a teacher, a friend, or a grandparent. I realize it’s completely illogical and irrational, but if she ever needs an epi-pen — either I want to administer it, or I want her trusted allergist to do so in my presence. I imagine that getting an epi-pen would be one of the scariest things that could happen, and I would want to be by her side to comfort her.
On the subject of neighborhood kids Rebecca commented on my Firsts Post with an interesting question:
I do have a question for everyone that has a child with life threatening food allergies: do you post any signs at your door? We have an older child that had a friend come over and want him to play while he stood there eating a peanut butter cookie. Any Advice?
I don’t have any advice. Am hoping some of you might help her. And me as well. Like Rebecca, I have had trouble educating neighborhood kids about food allergies. They don’t understand why I won’t let her climb trees (or share her scooter) with kids eating cheese sticks. They don’t understand why I say she can’t have a cookie because she’s allergic to milk. (They vehemently protest that the cookies are milk-free … to which I reply milk chocolate and butter are both milk products … they continue to argue with me and look at me like I am crazy. Repeat this loop a million times.) I have tried educating their parents. This approach sometimes works well, sometimes it does not. I am still reluctant to allow my daughter to play without my supervision — in the neighborhood or elsewhere.
At what magic age should we as parents start to lighten up a bit? I know that by doing so, she will have increased confidence to navigate the school cafeteria and sleep-away camp … aims to which I should aspire. I dread the day. Any thoughts or advice from those of you who have been there, or who dread it as I do?
October 20th, 2008 at 1:28 pm